Flow - The Blue Gold of the Earth

So I went to the movie showing of "Flow" presented by USUAA's Sustainability Committee and I was shocked. Fun fact: $2 worth of water can supply 5 families for a year in Africa. Although the $2 figure seems like nothing to us, some of those poor families cannot even afford it. What's even worse is that the big corporations control water over there. Can you believe that? The movie asks the important question of whether it is ethical to charge for water or not. The movie also compares water with air. Should people be charged for air? Personally, I'd ask the question: should people be charged for food? In my personal opinion, I think the movie should have phrased that question in a different way. Since water is regulated, filtered, and manufactured, I do--yes I do believe that the government should charge for water. There is always a choice of drinking water from lakes, but that isn't very safe at all. Anyway, the prominent problem in Africa needs to be resolved. Hopefully, the people in Africa can resolve the issue.

Morality

Today's class discussion was disgustingly difficult. As some were debating the issue of whether morals were "real" and "tangible", some sat quietly in their seats confused out of their minds. I on the other hand, was in the middle—took neither side, and occasionally thought out loud. Max brought about a really good question of whether cannibalism would have ever been justified in a world where humans were raised with having such beliefs. I have always disliked that question with a passion. If it ever came down to it, would a human being eat another human being in the name of survival? Which is the stronger driving factor for humans, morals or survival? Ultimately, I think it is survival as humans are known to be "self-interested". Self-interested meaning that humans are doing things for themselves, even if it does not seem so (e.g. feeding the hungry, at the same time hypothetically feeding yourself beta brainwaves to achieve the feeling of accomplishment). As beings who are "flawed", who is anyone to say which is the right way and which is the wrong way to live? Furthermore, who made up the rules and the laws of our land? That—is the million dollar question.

An average person beating another average person would definitely land both of them in jail. But unfortunately, the American society was raised upon the idea of the rich and famous being able to get away with anything and having the most influence. Therefore, I find the idea of celebrity feuds and which one gets to go to jail as entertainment—repugnant.

Is there such a thing?

Continuing with the topic of morality, there is not much more to say. There is literally not enough time in the world to civilly discuss morals so it is best to leave that topic for an ethics class. Although, the one thing I completely agree on is that picture above stating: "Morality - In America, it's not always as simple as black and white."

Why Humans?

Superiority...

Oliver caught my attention yesterday when he told the class about his greatest fear by comparing stars in space to humans on Earth. Immediately, it made me think of my regular drives from home to school. As I exit off the Minnesota highway and get half-way through Tudor road, there lies a stunning view of some snowcapped mountains. Every time I drive down Tudor road, I ponder upon these geographical giants as it never ceases to amaze me how tiny human beings are compared to these colossal, nature-induced contraptions. I often ask myself how there came to be so many of us (humans). Furthermore, I often ask myself how and why we consider ourselves the superior beings. If we are the superior beings, then why is it that we fear so much? Whether we fear spiders, heights, or confrontation, we should not label ourselves as superior because we fear. For example, a lion is more likely to overpower a human being as lions use their natural talents as predators of the wild, versus humans who more often than not, stand still in bone shaking fear waiting to be devoured. So my questions here are, are we at the mercy of the world, or is the world at our mercy?

 

 

Man Gone, What About Gorilla?

"With man gone will there be hope for gorilla?" I do not find this ambiguous question simple to answer. On the surface, if the human race were to become extinct, will a gorilla be able to live on its own? I saw this question in a post on blackboard and even after reading "Ishmael" by Daniel Quinn (1995), I still do not know what it means. Thinking about it, if the nameless student did not show up for his regular meetings with Ishmael, would there be hope for Ishmael and his story to be told? Furthermore, if humans were to be wiped off the face of the Earth, who will take care of it? What will it transform into? When will evolution resume?